Critique of a Charity’s Attempt to Collect Zakat

With the start of the new Islamic year upon us, I was reminded of a document that I had recently been given, and asked for my views concerning it. A document entitled: A Brief Guide to Zakat in the UK. It was produced by a Suffolk based charity in the UK. Of course from my own book written with Shaykh Abdalhaqq Bewley (Zakat – Raising a Fallen Pillar) and many subsequent writings and conversations, many will know that I don’t generally approve of charities taking on the collection of Zakat. In reality the pillar of Zakat requires a person in authority to be at the centre of it. If this person is backed up by a charity, then all well and good. For the moment we can overlook this as I want to concentrate on reviewing some of the other stances or methodologies that The Charity has adopted.

The Charity document has 6 pages. On page 1 they quite correctly state the great importance of sadaqa sent abroad to help needy Muslims and/or relatives. However, they quite rightly make a clear distinction between this and Zakat. Pleasingly they stress the fact that Zakat is to be collected and distributed locally and that sending it abroad is at best mukruh (disliked) except under very special circumstances. Indeed, on page 2 they offer evidence from the four madhabs to support this stance. This in itself is of utmost importance in that they have not fallen victim to the anti/non-madhabi stance that characterise the modernists, who have all but abandoned the deen.

The document continues on page 2 to outline some important characteristics needed for the collection and distribution of zakat, namely, ‘.. honest, reliable and competent..” So far so good, but unfortunately these words are followed by the word “organisations.” So here they have missed a trick. The deen was not established by organisations. The collection and distribution of Zakat is authorised by people in authority, amirs, governors, sultans and the like.

Committees and Boards of Trustees cannot do it. Look at those things a Muslim leader is entrusted with such as announcing the two eids (thus the beginning and end of Ramadan), minting the gold dinar and silver dirham, appointing Imams to lead the prayer, maintaining the weights & measures in the marketplace and of course the collection and distribution of Zakat. These thing are the responsibility of the man in charge and backed up by advisors, deputies or lieutenants and so on. He can even be supported by charitable institutions/awaqf like The Charity in question.

To their credit the author(s) get back on track on page 3 when clarifying who should pay Zakat and quite clearly address the issue of minors. The document also clarifies when Zakat is due (anytime really) and that it is not connected to Ramadan and thus not to be confused with Zakat-al-Fitr which is an obligation connected to fasting in Ramadan. Also on page 4 they address the nisab on monetary wealth which is either 20 gold dinars or 200 silver dirhams. They equate this to 40 ounces of silver. However in reality this is in fact closer to 19 troy ounces of silver and nearly 3 troy ounces of gold. It is perhaps easy to see why this mistake may have been made.

Firstly, not many people do the necessary research to establish what a dinar or dirham actually is. Today in many countries around the world Islamic Gold Dinars and Islamic Silver Dirhams are being minted under the auspices of the World Islamic Mint (WIM) according to the standards established by Umar ibn Al-Khattab. This includes the correlation specified between the Dinar and Dirham (that 7 dinars is the weight of 10 dirhams). hence we have a weight of 4.25 grams for a Gold Dinar and 2.975 grams for a Silver Dirham. So in weight the nisab would be 85 grams of gold or 595 grams of silver. Of course one should also work out the cost of obtaining a Silver Dirham or Gold Dinar in your locality and work it out on that price. In the UK the best place to look is on the Ayn Gold website.

It is interesting that they (The Charity) have decided to stick to the nisab of silver. This means that more people will be eligible to pay zakat as opposed to if the nisab of gold was taken. So at the time of writing anyone holding savings of around £1,000 (for over a year) would have to pay as opposed to well over £3,000 if the gold nisab were used. In my own community some years ago we made the decision to use the gold nisab. It was reasoned that this would avoid less well-off people having to pay, due to the depressed price of silver. However, I think that here The Charity have a much more authentic position by opting for silver in this matter. They do though, need to be aware of the current availability of actual silver dirhams in the UK and even the movement to have them used as currency. All of this is perhaps an indication that affairs of muamalat that involve daily commerce and other transactions tend not to be given the importance they are due. This is further evidenced by the fact that the document does not address the issue of Zakat on business stock or investments.

The Charity document quite correcly quotes from Surah Tawba the categories of person who may receive Zakat “These categories are the poor, the needy, workers in zakat, people whose hearts are to be reconciled (mu’allafat quloobuhum), captives, debtors, in the cause of Allah and wayfarers (travellers).”

Although not made clear it seems that The Charity are well aware that Zakat cannot be used to build mosques, schools or clinics and other similar noble causes.They are clear that it must be given to individuals in one of the eight categories mentioned. They are also well aware of the need to distribute Zakat locally. These two things by themselves are a great improvement and step forward that we hope will be replicated by other Muslim led charities. So for this the people involved with This Charity deserve great credit.

Sadly what has not been addressed is the matter of Muslim leadership, without which the pillar of Zakat can never truly be implemented properly. They have also failed to address the requirement to pay Zakat on monetary wealth in, Ayn or tangible wealth. In this case gold or silver (preferably dinars or dirhams) They are of course on shaky ground in assuming that paying in bank issued paper money is acceptable, but perhaps we will see something more on these matters at a later date.

May Allah grant us all Success establishing Zakat, abandoning riba, and being a part of bringing Allah’s Deen to life in the lands where we find ourselves.

Amin.

A Little Immodesty – by Abdussamad Clarke

re-posted courtesy of the Bookwright blog http://networkedblogs.com/n6HaT

Sometimes a man must cast modesty and humility aside and stand forth. My turn has come. In the late 80s I was calling for the abandonment of paper money and a return to gold and silver. It was published and it is there in black and white for anyone to read. Now the whole world, from William Rees-Mogg ex-editor of the Times to Max Keiser ex-stockbroker, is calling for the same. But I have no particular merit in this, for I had just returned to Ireland from attending the 1987 Norwich seminar Usury, the Root Cause of the Injustices of our Time1 at which the stupidity of paper money, the criminality of charging interest and other forms of usury, and the need to return to real transactions with things of actual worth was made blindingly clear by a number of distinguished speakers including Shaykh Abdalhaqq Bewley and Hajja Aisha Bewley, the renowned translators of the Qur’an into English. They in turn had listened attentively to Shaykh Dr. Abdalqadir as-Sufi who has been saying these things for as long as I can remember and at a time when no one else was saying them.

If we had had any of that paper money ourselves we would probably have been able to follow our own counsel and buy large amounts of gold and silver and would be doubly able to laugh at the rest of the world in its discomfiture as the economic system of usury goes down into something that would make a double-dip recession look like a picnic. But we had none and still have none.

But as we are people who have been proved so utterly and consistently right, I would like you to pay attention. I don’t think it will take so long for this to be fulfilled and it may be absolutely vital for you to know this if you have money and are considering taking this route.

But first of all, I have to make a retraction: in recent posts I have said, with some emphasis, that Islamic bankers and the scholars who gave them the fatwas that licensed their work are hypocrites. There was no call to make such a charge. For all I know they may be utterly well-meaning people who are completely sincere about their Islam.

Nevertheless, if you have a penny in ‘Islamic finance’ or ‘Islamic banking’ get it out while you have time. Not only is it not shari‘ah-compliant – notice that they invent another term rather than call it halal – but it is a bubble waiting to burst. Apparently it is now $1 trillion or so. Don’t be deceived by words such as murabaha, mudaraba, and musharaka etc., because they haven’t given a moment’s thought to the nature of the money which they are using in all those transactions, and the money which they are treating so ‘Islamically’ is not a great deal different from candy-floss, and even candy-floss is much better than the money they are using. So Islamic finance is one great $1 trillion pile of ‘Islamic’ candy-floss. It is an Islamic bubble waiting to burst Islamically and produce an Islamic disaster and quite probably an Islamic recession and, even worse, an Islamic depression as if things weren’t depressing enough as it is.

Get on the winning side and do not be suckered by fatwas from scholars who know nothing about the history of banking except what a university system that is sustained by banking allows them to know. Yes, get on the winning side and lay your hands on some of that gold and silver. Then do what the Muslims have always done: pay your zakat with it, and go out and spend some of that in the way of Allah and on good causes.

To read more from Abdussamad Clarke click here

Bookwright is the web-site of Abdassamad Clarke, Uthman Ibrahim-Morrison and Muhammad Amin Franklin. We translate classic texts of Islam and Sufism from Arabic to English and are also involved in all aspects of editing, indexing, proofreading, book and magazine production and design in Arabic and English.

Malaysian State of Kelantan to Begin Collection of Zakat in Gold Dinars and Silver Dirhams

Some great news from the state of Kelanatan in Malaysia that is fittingly shared on the Zakat Pages website

Courtesy of the Muamalat Council website

Exactly one year ago, on 12 August 2010, a small north-eastern state of Malaysia made a revolutionary step that may well have an impact on the modern world history: the government of Kelantan introduced bi-metallic medium of exchange, Islamic Gold Dinar and Silver Dirham, known in the history and tradition of Islam as Shariah Money. On August 12, 2010 for the first time in the last 100 years a government gave the people freedom to choose their medium of exchange. Since that historic moment up unitl today the entire population of Malaysia – except in Kelantan – was robbed 20% of purchasing power of their capitalist paper currency through a process of legalized theft a.k.a inflation. In contrast, during the same period of time people of Kelantan not only preserved the value of their Shariah coins, in fact the buying power of the sound money of Kelantan had increased: since 12 August 2010 the gold dinar appreciated against Ringgit by 30% while the silver dirham by 100%.

Yesterday, 18 August 2011, gold price hit new all time record – USD1,829. Gold rush that started early this year is apparently becoming pandemic, even the ideological enemies of honest money, central banks, are hastely buying up the yellow metal since they realize only gold will give them a breather when the finaincial tsunami, stocking over horizon, hits the entire globe; this tsunami will be so devastating that the 1997 and 2008 crises will look like a 4.0 magnitude earthquakes. Bank of Russia (Russian central bank), for example, in the last 6 months of 2011 has increased its official reserves by 50 tons making it in total 837 tons and, according to the statement of the vice-chairman of Bank of Russia, the bank’s plan is to keep increasing its gold reserves by minimum 100 tons annualy from now on.

As the world is watching in shock how the US government is trying to pull last tricks to cheat its creditors the people of Kelantan are boarding safe boats and sailing away from disaster of the usurious global economis system. Daily throughout the state sound money of Islam is offered to public at unified price by state-appointed agents (wakala); thousands of shops, business outlets and traders in Kelantan are accepting dinars and dirhams as means of payment; all state companies including utility providers too accept the Islamic currency.

And now, one year after the launch of Shariah Money, Kelantan makes yet another decisive and historic step towards restoring Divine order: on 25th August 2011 payment of Zakat, the third pillar of Islam, will be collected and paid with Shariah currency, Gold Dinar and Silver Dirham, in a public ceremony organized and officiated by the government. According to Islamic law Zakat al-Mal (annual tax on wealth) is collected from real tangible wealth such crops, livestock, gold, silver being in the possession for one year and it cannot be collected with debt contracts, promissory notes or worthless paper like dollar or ringgit. For gold and silver money Zakat al-Mal is 2.5% and it taken only when the wealth of a Muslim reaches the minimum level, 20 dinars or 200 dirhams, it follows that amount of collected Zakat starts from 0.5 gold dinar or 5 silver dirhams.

The historic event will take place at Kelantan Trade Centre in the capital of the state, Kota Bharu, on the 25th August 2011. The program will begin at 15:00 and end by Magrib followed by fast breaking dinner. The event will be officiated by the Chief Minister of the state’s administartion, Dato Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat, and state officials. Guests, media from all over the country as well as foreign delegations from Thailand, Singapore, Indonesia, Spain, England and Kazakhstan will attend the event that promises to trod the way for Muslim nations and communities around the world to restore the fallen pillar of Islam, Zakat.

Who will pay Zakat? Kelantan Government agencies, state companies, private companies and individuals from all over Malaysia who wish to pay Zakat with Halal money of Islam. Who will collect Zakat? The religious department of Kelantan administration, Majlis Agama Islam Kelantan, will set up its counters in the hall during the event; collected coins will be distributed on the same day or maximum within 24 hours. Who will receive Zakat? One thousand poor from various districts of the state will receive Zakat and will be able to spend it in the central market of Kota Bharu as well as shops in their respected areas whose list will be provided to zakat recipients.

This possibility to pay Zakat with Shariah money to official authorties is given to Malaysians for the first time. All Muslims of Malaysia, who have sufficient wealth to pay Zakat on, are cordially invited to join the Zakat Ceremony in Kota Bharu. The coins can be purchased right at the event as Wakalas will open their booths in there. For registration please contact the event organizers at: +6 09 744 1901.

We ask Allah to bless the Sultan of Kelantan, the administration and the people of Kelantan. We ask Allah to guide the Ummah to restoration of Muamalat according to the Amal of Medina al-Munawwara. We ask Allah to unite the Ummah and liberate the Muslim lands from the opression of Kufar. Ameen.

Original article:http://www.muamalahcouncil.com/news/34-general-articles/118-the-state-of-kelantan-collects-zakat-in-shariah-money.html

Time for a New Song

“London’s Burning, London’s Burning”
“People Crying, People Dying
“Shariah! Shariah!”
“Call on Allah, Call on Allah”

On a recent internet forum there was the usual discussion of when Ramadan should begin in the UK. Those (like myself) who propose basing it on a confirmed sighting of the moon within a suitable defined geographic region, were seen as courting controversy. Of course, such criticism often comes from those who want to “modernise” Islam or from aspiring orientalists.

However, that’s not the real controversial view. The thing some of our critics will really baulk at is the fact that I can categorically state that we do actually have the answers to transforming societies for the better. The answers are all there within the deen of Allah and Sunna of His Messenger, may Allah bless him and grant him peace. So it will be a difficult pill to swallow for some.

It’s clear that critical issues that need to be addressed are enterprise & employment, monetary policy, real local leadership, critical education and social justice.

So this is a call to all Muslim activists, to get in touch and work with us to start with ourselves and begin to transform the societies where we live. This is a call to action!

Muslims in Support of Marks & Spencers (or maybe not)

A few days ago i was sitting in the Mosque, just after one of the prayers, having a conversation with some fellow worshippers. If you had seen us you might have described as a black Jamaican, two white Englishmen, an Eritrean and a Sudanese. Of course that is all irrelevant, as is the fact that we were talking about the historical significance of Ethiopia, or the fact that we were joined by a man of Bangladeshi origin. However, it just helps paints the picture and give a sense of anticipation.

The latest addition to the circle added his own input to what he knew about about Ethiopia (quite a lot as it happens) and then steered the conversation to what was foremost on his mind. he was concerned about some Muslims preaching hatred of the kuffar (non-Muslims). he felt that we should appreciate the good that is dome by countries like the UK and USA in terms of the aid they give to poor countries. I acknowledged that some humanitarian aid is of course very useful. Of course he couldn’t have known that some time back I delivered a lecture on the very topic of the negative impact of foreign aid on African countries. In a nutshell, my argument was that governments that rely on aid (often called “hand over of natural resources bribe money”) then have no need to rely on raising revenue from the people of the country so therefore do not invest heavily developing the infrastructure of the country. This means very little development of roadways, markets, manufacturing, telephone networks or the internet. In contrast, a lot of money is spent creating government jobs for supporters, (so a huge civil service), gifting mining contracts to friends of donor countries, and a huge army to protect the income stream.

Our sixth man then went on to condemn those that suggest Muslims should boycott Marks & Spencers (huge department store/supermarket chain in the UK). Supporters of such an action suggest that either all or a significant chunk of M&S’s Saturday takings are sent to support Israel, or in particular, to support the exploitation, brutality and “murder” of Palestinians by jews. No doubt we will all have our views one way or another on all parts of that statement and I offer no proof one way or another in this article about what that company does with “it’s” money.

Back to the sixth man. His contention was that such a boycott was ill-advised because M & S offer very good quality food, clothing and other products for sale at very reasonable prices, so where else was one to go for such service?.

Many people of my generation would have been staunch and active supporters of boycotting South African goods in protest against the apartheid regime in that country.Of course the difference was that, at least on the face of it, the UK and other governments supported at least some action against the regime (despite all the backdoor dealing that was really going on). Today, however the UK, USA and other governments bend over backwards to turn a blind eye. Yet the actions carried out and the brutality inflicted by Israelis on Palestinians is second to none, as they continually take barbarity to another level.

My reply to our companion was not to suggest that Muslims should (or indeed should not, boycott Marks & Spencers). The point I made was that for a number of reasons Muslims should indeed think about where and how they spend there money. I also pointed out that if the pillar of Zakat were implemented properly it would result in huge cash flows from the richer to the poorer Muslims in the UK. It would empower communities and lead to a whole host of social benefits. I made a point of pointing out that helping communities and individuals abroad is a great and noble act of sadaqa/charity that should continue, but that if we call it Zakat we are denying the true nature and practice of one of the great secrets Allah has given us.

The other point is of course that Palestinian Muslims are now becoming a minority. It is the shia who seem to be in control as well as large christian factions. Indeed it is the Muslims who seem to be suffering most across the Arab world despite appearances.It is hard for a non-Muslim to grasp the fact that Tunisian, Iraqi, Algerian, and Syrian governments could really be Anti-Muslim. In fact it’s hard for many Muslims to grasp that.

The truth is that our Creator, Allah, has given the Muslims all the answers to today’s problems, but we have to recognise it, want it, and as much as possible put it into place. It is precisely this attitude that the sixth man showed that has taken the deen away from the land of the Arabs.

Now, what we really did not get into was the concept of the Islamic/Open market in a community, but perhaps another time. The key thing is that whether individuals make the choice or not to be selective about where they spend their money, there is a much bigger picture to think about which is NOT about the convenience and price of my nylon underwear or ready made fish pie. It is about Muamalat

Success is only by Allah.

A Definitive Guide to Personal Islamic Banking

In recent weeks it’s become even clearer to me that Islam DOES in fact have all the answers to the problems and challenges we are being faced with, whether, they be financial, social, spiritual or otherwise. However, this does not mean creating an Islamicised alternative to every societal ill. Some practices and institutions just simply have to be abandoned.

Take the example of the disgustingly called Islamic Banks with their disguised (100% riba) mortgages. The pro-riba activists argue that this institution is necessary to enable Muslims to buy their homes. Is that it? You permit and disguise riba so that Muslims don’t feel left out of the housing market? That really is literally playing with fire!

Unless we really get to grips with what we call Muamalat we’ll be going around in circles. In a Muslim led society there are core institutions and practices that do away with the causes of most of today’s problems and it is our duty to become familiar with them.

Unemployment is tackled by a free and open marketplaces accessible to anyone who wants to engage in commerce. Unjust monopolies, usurious manipulation and unfair commercial contracts are not permitted.

Poverty is firstly tackled through the correct collection and distribution of Zakat. This is complemented by the institution of awqaf, set up by wealthy Muslims, which take care of the mosques, soup kitchens, clinics, educational initiatives and much more.

Gambling, alcohol and other intoxicants are obviously not permitted and nothing more need be said about that.

On a more local and personal level, many of us have those people who come to us when they need a loan and conversely there are those people that we go to when we need a loan whether for business or personal reasons. There are also those individuals who voluntarily manage community saving schemes (pardner etc). These people are more effective “personal bankers” than anyone with that title working for a bank today. It is this combination of personal and institutionalised movement of capital/wealth that keeps any society wealthy as demonstrated in the great story of Az-Zubayr, may Allah be pleased with him, which we will look at in greater detail another time, Insha Allah.

Finally we have to make use of arbitration in settling disputes and also take advice when negotiating contracts. It is up to us to insist on no usurious clauses in our transactions and to include Islamically acceptable methods of settling disputes or winding up our businessses and contracts. This extends to wills and bequeaths.

With these things in place we are then left with a situation that encourages the movement of capital in what is a much “bigger” society than any conservative or coalition government could ever dream of. With these things in place we are beginning to look after the most vulnerable in our communities. By putting these things in place we are beginning to do what is pleasing to Allah. The added beauty is that we are in the wonderful position of being ble to implement all these things today, right now, right where we are.

May Allah shower great blessings on those movers of wealth amongst us and make their deeds count heavily in their favour on that day when ALL debts are called in.

Amin.

Statement On the Shariah Currency and Legal Tender

STATEMENT FROM IMAM HAJJ ABDALHASIB CASTINEIRA
Shariah Counselor of World Islamic Mint and Former Imam of the Great Mosque of Granada
Kuala Lumpur, 16th of August 2010
(posted courtesy of Gold Dinar & Muamalat Blog)

Bismillah irrahman irrahim
Regarding the matter of the Gold Dinar and Silver Dirham and Legal Tender in Malaysia

The Gold Dinar and Silver Dirham known as Shariah currency or Shariah coins in the Fiqh are not legal tender. The Shariah currency has no relation to present fiat currencies on many accounts and should not be legally or practically be compared or treated as the same. The Gold Dinar and Silver Dirham relates to religious matters, most important of which is the matter of payment of Zakat, rather than constitutional matters. Its introduction can only occurred on voluntary basis since freedom is a command from Allah in all commercial transactions including the acceptance of money. Its usage has been throughout history open to Muslim and non-Muslims alike.

All Praise is due to Allah, the most Compassionate, the most Merciful, the Lord of all the worlds, the King of the Day of Judgment, Who has gathered all knowledge in His Essence and Who is the Creator of all knowledge for eternity. All peace and blessings be upon His beloved Prophet, Muhammad, who was not taught by man but by Him, He was the last and most honored Prophet, the last in the chain of prophethood that was brought to this world and has guided us to the right path. May abundant peace and blessing be upon his Family and his Companions, who were chosen among the good and benevolent.
In relation to the present concern of the people regarding the Launching of the Shariah currency in the State of Kelantan on the last 2nd of Ramadhan 1431, as a witness of the momentous ceremony of the Launching in the city of Kota Bharu and as Shariah Counselor of World Islamic Mint, I would like to state in a manner of clarification and support to this initiative the following:

1.- The Gold Dinar and Silver Dirham are not legal tender. Legal tender or forced tender is an offered payment that, by law, cannot be refused in settlement of a debt, and have the debt remain in force. Personal cheques, credit cards, debit cards and similar non-cash methods of payment are not legal tender only the notes and coins of Malaysia are Legal Tender. The issuing of Legal Tender is the exclusive prerogative of the Federal Government and the Government of Kelantan never had nor has the intention to issue Legal Tender as that is legally impossible.
2.- The Dinar and the Dirham are known in the fiqh (see [a] Muqaddimah of ibn Khaldun) as the “Shariah currency”or “Shariah coins”. The term “Shariah coins” is specific to the Dinar and Dirham and is not applicable to any other coin made in gold, silver or any other material. Any other coin is known as “non-shari’i” (ibn Khaldun).

3.-Properly speaking the term “alternative currency” is not applicable to the Shariah coins or currency because the term “Shariah coins” is specific to the Dinar and Dirham and therefore is not alternative to any other coins or currency (non shari’i). It stands on its own without alternative. The use of the expression “alternative currency” can only be used if proper explanation is given in regards to the fundamental differences that exist in relation to the legal tender currencies such as the Malaysian Ringgit. The Malaysian Ringgit is an entirely different legal concept and has different functions. The Malaysian Ringgit is not based on a commodity (in Arabic ‘ayn, meaning tangible merchandise) like the Dinar and Dirham, the Malaysian Ringgit a promissory note (in Arabic dayn, meaning debt or liability) with no intrinsic value (its value as ‘ayn/tangible merchandise is the value of the paper close to zero) but with a fiat value which established by the compulsion law of the Federal Government through the Law of Legal Tender and it can change from time to time. On the other hand, the value of the Dinar and Dirham depends entirely on the market value of the commodity (gold and silver) on which it is manufactured, just like a kilo of rice depends on the value of rice. This difference in important in religious terms, for example, zakat which is a legal obligation of the Shariah has to be paid in ‘ayn but cannot be paid in dayn. (see [b] Al-Kasani). Muslims should, if having the choice(if no choice is given or no ‘ayn is available then darurah, that is exceptionality, is temporarily applicable), pay with ‘ayn rather than dayn.

5.- In linguistic sense, the Dinar and Dirham are not face values, but names that indicate specific weights. The Dinar is a specific weight of 4.25 grams and it is also known as mithqal in Arabic. The Dirham is a specific weight of 2.975 grams or 7/10 of the mithqal. In a way they are legally the same as saying “1kg of rice”. Therefore they are specific weights of commodity (gold and silver) which are mentioned in Qur’an and in many aspects of the Shariah regarding zakat and legal judgments; and thus they cannot be altered in their weight.

6.- In history, the Shariah coins has never been legal tender. In the practice of the early Muslim community the Shariah coins were not only currency used as means of payment. Barley, dates or salt were also used as means of payment and therefore no exclusive right was given to the Shariah coins. The reason for this “freedom to choose the medium of exchange” is that money is considered a part of trading it is regulated under the same Qur’anic injunction that regulates trade: “tijaratun ‘aan taradim minkum”, the meaning of which is “trade according to mutual consent”. “Mutual consent” excludes the idea of compulsion or monopoly in regards to trading. (see [c] Tafsir al-Jalalayn). This is another reason why the Dinar and Dirham are not legal tender and have never been legal tender. Freedom to choose the medium of exchange is a fundamental right granted by Allah to Muslims and non-Muslims alike. The use of the Shariah currency is therefore inclusive of non-Muslims.

7.-The term “currency” is commonly understood as legal tender or as fiat money that carries a face value. Since the “Shariah coins” are not legal tender and do not have a face value the” Shariah coins” should be better understood as a commodity rather than as “currency” in the common use of the term. Regarding current common practices, the use of the “Shariah coins” belongs to the category of barter, that is, the mutual exchange of products and services. It is arguable that in the past, before the introduction of legal tender laws, transactions made with gold and silver were consider normal transactions and the term barter was applicable to all other transactions. Therefore the use of the term “Shariah currency” should be understood with the limitations explained above and in consideration to the historical practice of the Muslims as it is relevant in the Islamic Jurisprudence.

8.- Until very recently in history “paper currencies” were defined as promissory notes in terms of gold and silver. In that sense they represented an ‘amanah’ (trusting wealth to someone who will keep it for you until you demand it) that is an obligation to pay on demand a certain amount of gold and silver. We know from history that this obligation was often not fulfilled and eventually the governments of the world decided gradually to eliminate the obligation to pay in specie altogether. The closest case of the default is the US dollar and its unilateral decision to break their “Bretton Woods Agreement”. This concept of ‘broken amanah’ is known in the Qur’an and carries legal implications as to the prohibition to accept amanah from non-Muslims unless they live under Muslim rule so that they can be obliged to pay their contractual obligations (see [d] Qadi Abu Bakr ibn al-Arabi). This legal injunction, which in theory implies the prohibition to accept British pounds, US dollars, etc. ( or any other currency backed by them), has been abrogated long ago since the colonial days by new laws that consider that this legal injunction is no longer applicable. Under the inspiration of the colonial legal systems, the constitutional Law of all Muslim countries including Malaysia grants the right to accept foreign promissory notes from non-Muslim countries (such as USD) to their own Central Bank (Bank Negara) as a reserve value for their own fiat currency. Because of this many Muslims (and non-Muslims) still mistakenly belief that their own fiat currency is backed by gold and silver when in fact no legal tender in the world is fully backed by specie anymore. The gold dinar and silver dirham are commodities and therefore they are not an ‘amanah: they are a tangible commodity (‘ayn), that is, when you pay with them, you hand over a certain amount of gold and silver and therefore they do not require to be backed by any other asset or authority other than itself. This is another reason why the Shariah currency cannot be compared or considered an alternative to “paper currencies”.

9.- Legal Tender is often a misunderstood concept. Coins and banknotes do not need to be ‘legal tender’ in order to be used as money to buy and perform other transactions for which money is intended. Legal tender must be accepted to settle a money debt. For example, US federal law does not restrict private businesses, persons or organisations in what methods of payment they choose to accept or refuse. Businesses are therefore free to insist on payment by credit card, for example, or to refuse larger denomination banknotes. In Canada for example, only Canadian dollar banknotes issued by the Bank of Canada are legal tender; however, commercial transactions may legally be settled in any manner agreed by the parties involved. A significant amount of business in Canada is transacted in United States dollars, despite United States currency not being legal tender. Legal tender can be refused unless or until a person is in debt, therefore vending machines and transport staff do not have to accept the largest denomination of banknote for a single bus fare or bar of chocolate, and even shopkeepers can reject large banknotes. However, restaurants that do not collect money until after a meal is served (a debt has been created) would have to accept any legal tender. The right of a trader to refuse to do business with any person means a purchaser cannot demand to make a purchase, and so declaring a legal tender other than for debts would be redundant.

10.- The minting of the Dinar and Dirham is a known practice of the Muslims from the early days of Islam. The first dated coins that can be assigned to the Muslims are copies of silver dirhams of the Sasanian Yezdigird III, struck during the Khalifate of Uthman, radiallahu anhu. These coins differ from the original ones in that an Arabic inscription is found in the obverse margins, normally reading “in the name of Allah”. Since then the writing in Arabic of the name of Allah and parts of Qur’an on the coins became a custom in all minting made by Muslims. In the year 75 (695) the Khalif Abdalmalik ordered Al-Haddjadj to mint the first dirhams, officially establishing the standard of Umar ibn al-Khattab, radiallahu anhu: 7/10 of the mithqal. The next year he ordered the dirhams to be minted in all the regions of the Dar al-Islam. He ordered the coins to be stamped with the sentence: “Allahu Ahad, Allahu Samad”. The minting of the coins is considered an obligation of the Sultan that needs to be followed (see [e] al-Qurtubi).
And Victory belongs to Allah. In Him we trust and praise belong to the Lord of the worlds and peace and blessings on His Messenger.
The slave of Allah, Hajj Abdalhasib Castineira, in Kuala Lumpur, on the 5th of Ramadhan, 1431.


NOTES

A] Imam Abu Zayd Ibn Khaldun (d. 1406)
“The Revelation undertook to mention them and attached many judgments to them, for example zakat, marriage, and hudud. Therefore within the Revelation they have to have a reality and specific measure for assessment (of zakat, etc.) upon which its judgments may be based rather than on the non-shari’i (other coins).
Know that there is a consensus (ijma) since the beginning of Islam and the age of the Companions and the Followers that the dirham of the shari’ah is that of which ten weigh seven mithqals (weight of the dinar) of gold… The weight of a mithqal is seventy-two grains of barley, so that the dirham which is seven tenths of it is fifty and two fifths grains. All these measurements are firmly established by consensus.”
“Al-Muqaddimah”

B] Imam Abu Bakr al-Kasani ( d.1191)
“If the property on which zakat fell due is dayn, as distinguished from ‘ayn, its zakat may be settled in terms of ‘ayn wealth. Thus a person having a claim of two hundred dirhams on which zakat is due, may give, in settlement of the same, five dirhams in cash, because dayn as compared with ‘ayn is defective (naqis) and the ‘ayn is complete (kamil), and a settlement of the defective in terms of the complete is valid. On the contrary, the settlement of the complete ‘ayn in terms of the defective (dayn) is not valid, and therefore, the zakat debt is not discharged if a person wants to pay the zakat of two hundred dirhams which he possesses (i.e. ‘ayn) in terms of the five dirhams which a poor person owes him (i.e. dayn); namely, by absolving him from the debt intending it for his own zakat debt on the two hundred dirhams.”
“Bada’i` al-Sana’i”

C] Shaykh Jalaluddin al-Mahalli & Shaykh Jalaluddin al-Suyuti

Allah says in the Qur’an (4, 29):
{ يَٰأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ آمَنُواْ لاَ تَأْكُلُوۤاْ أَمْوَٰلَكُمْ بَيْنَكُمْ بِٱلْبَٰطِلِ إِلاَّ أَن تَكُونَ تِجَٰرَةً عَن تَرَاضٍ مِّنْكُمْ وَلاَ تَقْتُلُوۤاْ أَنْفُسَكُمْ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ كَانَ بِكُمْ رَحِيماً }
Tafsir:
“O you who believe, consume not your goods between you wrongly, unlawfully according to the Law, through usury or usurpation, except it be trading (tijāratan, also read tijāratun), so that the goods be from trade effected, through mutual agreement, through mutual good-will: such [goods] you may consume. And kill not yourselves, by committing what leads towards destruction on account of some affiliation, be it in this world or the Hereafter. Surely God is ever Merciful to you, when He forbids you such things.”
“Tafsir al-Jalalayn”


D] Qadi Abu Bakr Ibn al Arabi (d. 1148)
Allah says in the Qur’an (3:75):
“And amongst the People of the Book there are those who, if you were to entrust them with a treasure (qintar), he would return it to you. And amongst them is he who, if you were to entrust him with a dinar would not return it to you, unless you kept standing over him. “
Tafsir:
“the benefit that can be taken from this is the prohibition of entrusting (amanah) the People of the Book with goods. The question concerning entrusting property is legislated by the text of Qur’an.”
“Ahkam al-Qur’an”

E] Imam Abu Abdallah Al-Qurtubi (d. 1273)

Allah says in the Qur’an (4:59):
“O you who believe! Obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in command among you..”
Tafsir:
“The ayat is an order to obey the Sultan in respect to seven obligations: the minting of the dinar and the dirham, fixing weights and measure, legal judgments, Hajj, Jumu’ah, the two Eids and Jihad.”
“Al-Jami’ li-Ahkam al-Qur’an”

When Does Ramadan Begin?

I overheard a few seconds of a show being recorded yesterday for Ramadan TV (RTV). It was being made clear that the beginning of Ramadan can be based on of two things: Either a physical sighting of the new moon OR having completed 30 days of Shaban.

So far, so good, the 30 days of Shaban are self-explanatory All we have to do now is determine what constitutes a physical sighting of the moon. Again, listen to the ulema and we find that it’s a sighting by (1)a lot of people or (2) a verified sighting by a smaller number of trusted people within a particular region (specifically the distance from Andalusia to the Hijaz being too far apart).

Now if we take a look at this page (http://moonsighting.com/1431rmd.html) from the moonsighting.com website and it will be clear that something is certainly not right.

it is particularly disappointing when so many national Islamic bodies or umbrella groups have done the hard work and managed to get themselves together to make a joint decision on the beginning of Ramadan only to fall short at the final hurdle and base it on a calculation. Surely in a country like the USA, for example, that energy could have been used to appoint small teams of people across the country to go out to certain vantage points in order to look for the new moon each month. This is done in Cape Town in South Africa and other places, but unfortunately the curse of modernist thinking again prevails.

The message I want to send to all those who:
• accept that leadership is essential to the proper collection and distribution of zakat;
• accept that Zakat on wealth needs to be paid in gold or silver;
• recognise that paper and electronic money and the banks that issue them are totally haram and constitute riba;
…is not to despair.

There are those who will immediately grasp the soundness of the position and accept the arguments. So just as one by one, individuals, organisations and now countries are accepting the position on how Ramadan should begin, similarly there are those who immediately recognise the need for the proper collection of zakat and establishing halal currency, By coming together on these issues insha Allah we will get success.

KELANTAN DINAR AND DIRHAM HAVE ARRIVED

Probably the biggest news story of the millenium
Courtesy of the Muamalat Council website

For most of Malaysians the morning on Tuesday, 8th June 2010, was just another morning in their existence – monotonous run on the capitalist treadmill – nothing extraordinary indeed: the same tropical weather (+32C) outside, same sickening news in the media, same interest rates, same order of the day.

But for the people of Kelantan this morning was very special: on the 8th June 2010 at 11am the box with the set of the first gold dinars and silver dirhams of the State of Kelantan arrived to Kuala Lumpur from the World Islamic Mint, Dubai. Sending the sample coins is the standard procedure in minting industry, the main lot will follow just in a matter of days.

Although Kelantan government first minted gold dinars in 2006, the new coins have a new reality because:

* This is the first time when not just gold dinar but also silver dirham has been minted;
* This is the very first time the Kelantan dinars and dirhams are minted in accordance with the international standard which is set by World Islamic Trade Organization (WITO) and monitored by World Islamic Mint (WIM); 99% of all dinars & dirhams minted worldwide in the last 20 years is the work of WIM, hence the new Kelantan coins – the reverse side of the coins bear the logo of WIM while on the obverse is coat of arms and name of Kelantan Government – have international status and acceptance among millions of muslim and non-muslim users around the world;
* This is also the first time when the coins are minted in all denominations: Dinar – ½, 1, 2, 5, 8; Dirham – 1, 2, 5, 10, 20;
* Unlike before this time the new coins will be distributed to public throughout the state of Kelantan under homogenized pricing scheme and proportionate value between denominations;
* And most significantly, this is the first time when all state companies in Kelantan will accept the Islamic coins as well as 600 shops (in the first phase) displaying the sticker “We Choose Dinar&Dirham” thus instantly giving a broad avenue for the public to utilize their coins.

And this is just the beginning, the second phase will see introduction of features like safe-keeping facilities (wadiah) and electronic payment system to further enhance the level of customers’ convenience.

click here to see the full article on the Muamalat Council website

Khutba on Commerce

A Khutbah given by the Imam – Shaykh Habib Bewley at the jumuah Mosque of Cape Town 2nd April 2010

الحمد لله، الحمد لله الذي جعل صحةَ الإنسان وحياةَ المجتمعِ في إصلاح المعاملة، وحفِظها في المدينة المنورة، نحمده تعالى ونستعينه، ونشكره تعالى ونستغفره ونستغيثه، نعوذ بالله من شرور أنفسنا ومن سيئات أعمالنا، من يهد الله فهو المهتد ومن يضلل فلن تجد له وليا مرشدا، ونشهد أن لا إله إلا الله وحده لا شريك له، له الملك و له الحمد، يحيي ويميت، بيده الخير، وهو على كل شيء قدير، ونشهد أن سيدنا و مولانا محمداً عبده ورسوله، وحبيبه وصفيه، بلغ الرسالة وأدى الأمانة ونصح الأمة، النبي الأمي الذي أرسله الله بالهدى والدين الحق، بشيرا ونذيرا بين يدي الساعة، صلى الله عليه وسلم وعلى آله وأصحابه ومن تبعهم بإحسان إلى يوم الدين.

أما بعد! فيا عباد الله اتقوا الله حق تقاته ولا تموتن إلا وأنتم مسلمون. يأيها الذين ءامنوا اتقوا الله وقولوا قولا سديدا يصلح لكم أعمالكم ويغفر لكم ذنوبكم. ومن يطع

الله ورسوله فقد فاز فوزا عظيما. اتقوا الله فيما أمر وانتهوا عما نها عنه وزجر.

As I mentioned last week, for a society to be healthy, its muamalat (transactions or dealings) must be healthy – it must be possible to go through one’s life – indeed get through a single day – without falling into the haram. Many people when they think of muamalat think of courtesy, brotherhood, marriage and divorce, but neglect that one area wherein lies the re-empowerment of the Muslim umma – trade. So accustomed have they become to accepting the status quo, so deceived by the master deceivers of the present age, that few question where their money comes from and fewer still question the money itself. Riba, a practice so bad that it is one of the only things Allah and His Messenger declare war on, for Allah says:

يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آَمَنُوا اتَّقُوا اللَّهَ وَذَرُوا مَا بَقِيَ مِنَ الرِّبَا إِنْ كُنْتُمْ مُؤْمِنِينَ فَإِنْ لَمْ تَفْعَلُوا فَأْذَنُوا بِحَرْبٍ مِنَ اللَّهِ وَرَسُولِهِ

the translation of which is, “You who have belief! have taqwa of Allah and forgo any remaining riba if you are believers. If you do not, know that it means war from Allah and His Messenger.” Riba, a practice so bad that it is considered worse than fornicating with one’s own mother in the precincts of the Kaaba, today scarcely enters into people’s minds except with respect to avoiding interest-bearing bank accounts. And yet its dust has settled on every transaction that takes place in the present age, for it is within the currency itself. We are all trapped within its embrace and we are all enslaved to it as we are plugged in and totally reliant on its institutions – its banks and the phantom currencies in which they deal, its faceless global corporations, its puppet democratic governments and its stock exchanges.

Now, some Muslims, recognising the predicament we are in, have sought to reform these institutions – Islamicise them if you will. So, they change certain superficial elements of these institutions and lo, instead of banks we have Islamic banks, instead of paper currency, we have Islamic paper currency, and instead of stock trading, we have Islamic stock trading. There we go, everything is as good as new, but in truth nothing has changed. The names may be different, but the underlying processes are the same. And what do you expect, when the institutions themselves have nothing whatsoever to do with the deen of Allah.

Did you hear about the Islamic development bank of Madina funding the jihad and social projects of the Messenger of Allah? No, because no such thing existed. Did you hear about Umar ibn al-Khattab being re-elected to the khilafa by a slim majority following his successes in the wars against the Byzantines? No, because no such thing happened. Did you hear about Uthman printing up a whole new batch of fresh paper dinars to protect the Islamic currency against the speculations of the Persian money traders? No, because no such thing was done. For these are not the institutions upon which the Muslim model for trade was built. Rather, they are the institutions developed by the usurers to extend their web and trap into it as many unsuspecting flies as they can. They are the instruments of riba, and no matter how much we tweak them, that is what they will always. A wolf is a wolf, even when it is dressed up in sheep’s clothing.

So, if reform is not the solution, then what is? The answer is found in the Quran and is beautiful in its simplicity. Allah says,

وَأَحَلَّ اللَّهُ الْبَيْعَ وَحَرَّمَ الرِّبَا

the translation of which is, “Allah has made trade halal and made riba haram .” The answer is re-establishing the institutions about which trade is, and always has been, built – that is how we will extricate ourselves from our situation. And that is how we will gain success, for Allah is with those who are with Him. Those institutions are the free market, the caravans, the guilds and currency with intrinsic value. Today, we will direct our attention to the free market.

The most important part of any city, along with its mosque, has always been its marketplace – this was as true in medieval Christian Europe as it was in the Muslim lands. And it always enjoyed pride of place, next to the main centre of worship or the city hall. Indeed, many cities developed around market-places, rather than market-places being added to a city. And that is because the market-place was, and can be again, the primary source of a city’s wealth and only venue where trading can take place in a safe and properly regulated environment.

The proof of the importance of a free market with respect to the Deen of Allah is found in the sunna of the Messenger of Allah, for one of the first things he did, upon arriving in Madina, after overseeing the building of the mosque, was to set up a new market for the Muslims. And the reason he did that was to provide the Muslims with a venue where they could be free of the oppression that they were forced to undergo every time they tried to trade in the market already present in Madina – that of the Banu Qaynuqa’, one of the three Jewish tribes living in Madina at the time. For the overseers of that market used to levy taxes on the traders, set up monopolies, rent out spaces and engage in usurious transactions, all of which go against the principles of free trade and the Islamic market as we shall see in the second khutba. And that is uncannily similar to the situation we find ourselves in today where again we find ourselves oppressed and overtaxed and forced to use venues and institutions that contradict the very principles of our deen. And all the while they oppress us, they tell us that that is the natural consequence of ‘free trade’, a term that in fact means the very opposite of what it says. Indeed in 1853, Henry Carey, the chief financial adviser of Abraham Lincoln, equated it to slavery and exploitation, saying in his book, The Slave Trade: Domestic and Foreign, “By adopting the ‘free trade,’…we place ourselves side by side with the men who have ruined Ireland and India, and are now poisoning and enslaving the Chinese people.”

Our jihad, our duty as Muslims today, is to join with Allah and His Messenger in declaring war on riba. Our duty is to re-establish ‘free trade’ in the true sense of the word by reclaiming the market-place.

أقول قولي هذا و أستغفر الله لي و لكم و لسائر المسلمين من كل ذنب فاستغفروه إنه هو الغفور الرَّحيم.الحمد لله الحمد لله رب العالمين، وأشهد أن لا إله إلا الله وحده لا شريك له وأشهد أن محمداً عبده ورسوله، صلى الله وسلم وبارك عليه وعلى آله وصحبه، والتابعين وتابعي التابعين ومن تبعهم بإحسان إلى يوم الدين.

أما بعد! فيأيها الذين ءامنوا اتقوا الله ما استطعتم واسمعوا وأطيعوا وأنفقوا خيرا لأنفسكم. يا عباد الله أوصيكم وإياي بتقوى الله وطاعته وأحذركم وإياي عن معصيته ومخالفته. قال الله تعالى في كتابه الكريم: وَمَا أَرْسَلْنَا قَبْلَكَ مِنَ الْمُرْسَلِينَ إِلَّا إِنَّهُمْ لَيَأْكُلُونَ الطَّعَامَ وَيَمْشُونَ فِي الْأَسْوَاقِ

Allah says in His Noble Book, the translation of which is, “We never sent any Messengers before you who did not eat food and walk in the market-place.”

The free market of the Muslims – this market-place in which Messengers walked – is based on a number of principles:

The first is the freedom of opportunity. Everyone, no matter how little they wanted to sell, was free to use the market whenever he wanted – there was no requirement for trader’s licence or anything else. It is narrated that Ali ibn Abi Talib, said,

سوق المسلمين كمصلّى المصلّين، فمن سبق إلى شيء فهو له يومه حتى يدعه

“The markets of the Muslims are like their places of prayer – whoever gets first to any part of it, then it is his for that day until he leaves it.” In other words, just like mosques, and just like bridges, roads and public gardens, everyone should have an equal right to use and benefit from markets. So, whoever got a place in the market first, it was his to use, regardless of who had been using the place the previous day. First come, first served. Nobody had the right to pre-book a spot, as is shown by the following account of Umar ibn al-Khattab.

مر عمر بن الخطاب على باب معمر بالسوق، وقد وضع على بابه جرة ، فأمر بها أن تقلع، فنهاه عمر أن يحجر عليها أو يحوزها

Umar ibn al-Khattab once passed by the Gate of Ma’mar in the market and saw that a jar had been placed by the gate, so he commanded that it be taken away. Umar forbade anyone to put any stones on a place or lay claim to it in any way.

And that is because the suq is a public space, not belonging to anyone. Ibn Zabala narrated that Muhammad ibn Abdallah ibn Hasan said,

أن رسول الله تصدق على المسلمين أسواقهم

“The Messenger of Allah gave the Muslims their markets as a sadaqa.” And as a consequence of that, they must be free to use – no rent can be charged for their use. Umar ibn Abdal-Aziz said,

إنما السوق صدقة فلا يضربن على أحد فيه كراء

“The market is a sadaqa, so no one should be charged rent in it.” This is a fundamental principle of the market, for if there is a necessity to pay rent then it prevents the very poor or those who only have a small amount of goods to sell from using the market. And this principle has largely been forgotten by the Muslims today with many of the Islamic markets that are set up charging the traders astronomical rents. And often those rents, they say, are necessary to pay for the costs of flying in superstar Muslim speakers from all over the world to speak at those events. So putting the deen into practice is put aside in favour of talking about how to put it into practice. Mashallah, what a world we live in.

Another principle of the market was that it was prohibited for taxes to be levied on it – when the Prophet first came to the market of Madina, he struck the ground with his foot and said

هذا سوقكم فلا يضيق ولا يؤخذ فيه خراج

“This is your market – it is not to be constricted nor may a tax be taken in it.” There is no income tax in Islam, and it is not for the Sultan to levy such a tax on his citizens and those who make use of the market. The only thing that should be paid on one’s trade is zakat.

And nor may any buildings or permanent structures be erected in the market-place, because that is a way of constricting the space and restricting access. The Prophet said,

هذا سوقكم لاتتحجروا ولا يضرب عليه خراج

“This is your market. Do not build anything in stone in it and do not let any tax be levied in it.” It is a publicly-owned space. You would not go to the mosque and build yourself a special prayer room, so nor should you do the same in a market. That is not to say that shops or storehouses are forbidden for they are not. It is perfectly acceptable to build yourself a shop on your own land. But not in the market-place. It needs to be kept empty and free so that anyone and everyone can come and use it an any time. That is the way to encourage trade and encourage the circulation of wealth, for if there was no available venue, then there would be no incentive for traders to set up caravans and travel to far-off cities to sell their wares.

Another principle of the market is that there can be no monopolies. And monopolies come about when one permits capital to command the price, so there is no wholesale price and retail price. A person is not permitted to undercut his competitor simply because he is wealthier and is able to buy more stock. Umar ibn al-Khattab passed by a man selling raisins, two mudds for a dirham, so he said to him,

زد في السعر وإلا فاخرج من سوقنا

“Either raise your price or leave our market.”

All of these principles are to ensure freedom of opportunity and guard against monopolies or the cornering of the market. And that is essential to preserve the health of a society and preserve equity. Every urban area needs such a market, just as every urban area needs roads, highways and places of worship. Without it, everyone is soon converted into wage slaves for the giant monopolies and corporations that take their place. And all human dignity is lost. So we ask Allah to help us re-establish the markets, and give every human the opportunity to regain that dignity. We ask him to make us like the traders about whom In Abbas said,

أوصيكم بالتجار خيرا فإنهم بُرُدُ الآفاق و أمناء الله في الأرض

“I advise you to be good to the traders, for they are the cloaks that guard against calamities and Allah’s trusted ones upon the Earth.”

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.